@darinlatham @_Four_Horsemen @RichardDawkins They didn't; only YOU have been using the term "nothing".
-
-
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins You might want to read the title of the book Dawkins recommended I read Emlyn. -
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins The perennial problem is that, because you operate in black-and-white, you won't look deeper. -
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins. And you state this based upon your thorough knowledge of my life experience and background -
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins If you're now going to invoke the tired "subjectivity" canard, go jump off a building.#Gravity -
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins I have no idea what u r talking about. -
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Yes you do. Subjectivity is not an argument against observable KNOWABLE phenomena. -
@emlynaddison
@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins Observable only applies to "something" not "nothing" -
@darinlatham@_Four_Horsemen@RichardDawkins But you, you criticize even the STUDY of such questions using lame semantic parries. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.