@PumaBare @hittinthepipe @TakeThatDarwin But they're all finches, yes?
-
-
Replying to @davidnisbet87
@davidnisbet87 Stop using dishonest tactics, you're being disingenuous with a label.@hittinthepipe@TakeThatDarwin13 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PumaBare
@PumaBare@hittinthepipe@TakeThatDarwin Can you answer the question?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidnisbet87
@davidnisbet87 When you admit you're using a dishonest argument tactic, trust me, you're not original.@hittinthepipe@TakeThatDarwin2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @PumaBare
@PumaBare@hittinthepipe@TakeThatDarwin 2/2 Who's being dishonest?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidnisbet87
@davidnisbet87 You are, by trying to use the word "finch" rather than recognize their genetic diversity, which is what evolution describes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @SkepticalKnight
@SkepticalKnight@TakeThatDarwin@PumaBare So one kind of fish turned into another kind?8 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @davidnisbet87
Folklore obsessives like
@davidnisbet87 call speciation impossible but friendly whales, plotting snakes & 900-year-old sailors plausible.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Spin, evade, ignore; anything but let slip that he recognizes the flaw in his argument. @SkepticalKnight @TakeThatDarwin @PumaBare
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.