@linkshund wtf are you TALKING about. YOU claim gods so YOU must produce the evidence. Period. @Perdnoot @thom_roland
@linkshund @Perdnoot @thom_roland No. What are your convictions on the subject of GODS.
If you start feigning ignorance again, we're done.
-
-
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland Does a person need convictions on the subject of GODS? I take it yours are very strong. -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland No, no. no. There you go again. Stop evading. Answer the question. -
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland I have never claimed to have convictions on the subject of GODS. You are being very silly. -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland You make assertions about others' position on supernatural agencies, but claim you have none. Bullshit. -
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland Surely to make assertions on something by definition unfalsifiable is extremely irrational? -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland So your position is that supernatural agencies are "unfalsifiable"? -
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland If you disagree, tell me how this might be falsified. -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland No, answer the fucking question. Do you believe in a god? - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.