@linkshund Is that your little go-to line? Think you've cracked it?
+ Let's see YOUR proof, motherfucker. I'll wait. @Perdnoot @thom_roland
-
-
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland Your anger is unbecoming to rational, scientific debate. Calm down if you want to be taken seriously. -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland Why don't we unhinge you, for a moment from your 38% monomania and ask you about YOUR conviction. Ready? -
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland My convictions are to demand evidence for claims before accepting them. -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland No. What are your convictions on the subject of GODS. If you start feigning ignorance again, we're done. -
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland Does a person need convictions on the subject of GODS? I take it yours are very strong. -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland No, no. no. There you go again. Stop evading. Answer the question. -
@emlynaddison
@Perdnoot@thom_roland I have never claimed to have convictions on the subject of GODS. You are being very silly. -
@linkshund@Perdnoot@thom_roland You make assertions about others' position on supernatural agencies, but claim you have none. Bullshit. - 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.