@BS_Detector_ @thom_roland @Perdnoot What's your specific objection to the statistic?
-
-
Replying to @linkshund
@linkshund You keep asking the same pointless question. The "data" itself is irrelevant.@BS_Detector_@thom_roland@Perdnoot1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Why? What scientific reason do you have for rejecting it?
@BS_Detector_@thom_roland@Perdnoot2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @linkshund
@linkshund STUDY THE ATHEISM GRAPH, EINSTEIN. Jesus, seriously?@BS_Detector_@thom_roland@Perdnoot1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@BS_Detector_@thom_roland@Perdnoot Which data set on a which specific graph are you referring to?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @linkshund
Certainly not one of yours, since you are a pathetic little liar.
#atheists@linkshund @emlynaddison@BS_Detector_@thom_roland1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Perdnoot
Really
@Perdnoot you are becoming incoherent with anger @emlynaddison@BS_Detector_@thom_roland2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @linkshund
It takes a special type of loser to lie about the statistics he cites. That loser is the ever compensating
@linkshund.#atheists2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Perdnoot
@Perdnoot@linkshund If the statistics he cited even meant anything. They ignore the foundation of Gnosticism. The usual dumb caterwauling.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@Perdnoot @linkshund miss-type--should be Agnosticism: see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticism …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.