.@JahRastafariMMA What? Like in Star Trek? @crazy_stairz @HomunculusLoikm @emlynaddison @altug_g #Atheism
Humans like @JahRastafariMMA can't be reasoned with b/c critical thinking begins w/ "god" @HomunculusLoikm @Stooshie @crazy_stairz @altug_g
-
-
@emlynaddison
@JahRastafariMMA@HomunculusLoikm@Stooshie @crazy_stairz say u believe & it's over. using science making a mockery of himself -
@altug_g @emlynaddison@Stooshie @crazy_stairz you also mock#Nature Journal which published THIS w NO rebuttal EVER http://henry.pha.jhu.edu/The.mental.universe.pdf … -
@HomunculusLoikm God is a theist's observation and not a thing. And Conn's article is not about deities.@altug_g@Stooshie @crazy_stairz -
@emlynaddison
@altug_g@Stooshie @crazy_stairz you either don't know how 2 read English OR you#lie to defend#AtheisTrollCall#atheism dang -
@HomunculusLoikm Conn's article is not about gods or belief in supernatural agencies. Care to retort?@altug_g@Stooshie @crazy_stairz -
.@emlynaddison Homunculus is obsessed with 1 wrong headed idea & has about 4 articles he links to.
@HomunculusLoikm@altug_g @crazy_stairz -
.
@Stooshie And@HomunculusLoikm didn't answer a SINGLE one of my questions. Pretty telling isn't it?@altug_g @crazy_stairz -
.@emlynaddison He can't. He bases everything on a misunderstanding of the observer effect.
@HomunculusLoikm@altug_g @crazy_stairz#Atheism - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison
@JahRastafariMMA@HomunculusLoikm@Stooshie @crazy_stairz what I don't get is the effort to try to prove a deity w/ science -
@altug_g @emlynaddison@JahRastafariMMA@Stooshie @crazy_stairz last point. Not TRYING To prove a deity, it was DONE by Bohr & Einstein 1927 -
@HomunculusLoikm Right, right... as you keep insisting. Where are all the publications??@altug_g@JahRastafariMMA@Stooshie @crazy_stairz
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.