@Stooshie The names of the papers are there. Try http://scholar.google.com . #internet
@InternetUsrname @DoggySpew @PopuliAtheist @francosoup
-
-
Replying to @biolosophy
@biolosophy@Stooshie @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist @francosoup But you must have the links because you've reviewed the studies, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InternetUsrname
@InternetUsrname Sure. Which one would you like?@Stooshie @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist @francosoup2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LTider
@DoggySpew I don't accept anything by DI. I criticially evaluate sci. evidence.
#freethought@InternetUsrname@Stooshie@PopuliAtheist4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @biolosophy
.
@biolosophy No you don't. You pre-suppose a creator & desperately try to make evidence fit. @DoggySpew@InternetUsrname@PopuliAtheist3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Stooshie
@Stooshie Um... not sure how to respond to that. No I don't? @DoggySpew@InternetUsrname@PopuliAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @biolosophy
.
@biolosophy Er, yes you do. There's no evidence of a god yet you keep saying there is. @DoggySpew@InternetUsrname@PopuliAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Stooshie
@Stooshie Please remember that a dog turd constitutes evidence of their god.@biolosophy @DoggySpew@InternetUsrname@PopuliAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison I've never said anything about god.
@Stooshie @DoggySpew@InternetUsrname@PopuliAtheist3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@biolosophy Oh here we go... Intelligent Design without a supernatural agency. OK then. @Stooshie @DoggySpew @InternetUsrname @PopuliAtheist
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.