@InternetUsrname Here ya go, champ: http://www.discovery.org/a/2640
@DoggySpew @PopuliAtheist @Stooshie @francosoup
-
-
Replying to @biolosophy
@biolosophy @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist@Stooshie @francosoup And links to the actual studies it mentions are where?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InternetUsrname
@InternetUsrname Are you serious? They're literally... right there. Click the link. @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist@Stooshie @francosoup2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @biolosophy
.
@biolosophy Nope, there are no links to the actual papers.@InternetUsrname @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist @francosoup#Evolution1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Stooshie
@Stooshie The names of the papers are there. Try http://scholar.google.com .#internet@InternetUsrname @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist @francosoup2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @biolosophy
@biolosophy@Stooshie @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist @francosoup But you must have the links because you've reviewed the studies, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InternetUsrname
@InternetUsrname Sure. Which one would you like?@Stooshie @DoggySpew@PopuliAtheist @francosoup2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LTider
@DoggySpew I don't accept anything by DI. I criticially evaluate sci. evidence.
#freethought@InternetUsrname@Stooshie@PopuliAtheist4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @biolosophy
.
@biolosophy No you don't. You pre-suppose a creator & desperately try to make evidence fit. @DoggySpew@InternetUsrname@PopuliAtheist3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
"@biolosophy philosophical shackles of naturalism??"
+ So, supernaturalism then? Oi. @DoggySpew @InternetUsrname @PopuliAtheist @Stooshie
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.