@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison @mrozatheist My point exactly from the very beginning.
-
-
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson No, the burden of proof is on the claimant, not the disputant.@AtlanticCanuck@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison http://www.reasonablefaith.org/definition-of-atheism …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison it implies a very high improbability, but it does not prove impossibility.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison make a claim of knowledge without evidence. That's the whole point of being a rationally thinking atheist to me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.