@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison @mrozatheist If I assert that "leprechauns do not exist," will you not require justification for my assertion?
-
-
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson Yes. If you CLAIM they don’t exist, prove it! @emlynaddison@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtlanticCanuck
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist My point exactly from the very beginning.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson No, the burden of proof is on the claimant, not the disputant.@AtlanticCanuck@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison http://www.reasonablefaith.org/definition-of-atheism …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison it implies a very high improbability, but it does not prove impossibility.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.