@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison @mrozatheist If I assert that "leprechauns do not exist," will you not require justification for my assertion?
@jlr3 If you entertain the 0.001% possibility that French-Speaking Octopus Asteroids *could* exist then our known reality is meaningless.
-
-
@emlynaddison make a claim of knowledge without evidence. That's the whole point of being a rationally thinking atheist to me.
-
@jlr3 ie: To say that "anything could theoretically exist" is just being pointlessly academic for the sake of superficial rectitude. -
@emlynaddison that's fair. I still can't claim myself to be gnostic on the subject without feeling intellectually dishonest.
-
@jlr3 I don't perceive any dishonesty in asserting confidence in things based on our experiential understanding of the physical world. >
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison nonsense. In all likely hood these things dont exist, and it is practical to assume they dont. But I don't see how you can 1/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.