@emlynaddison @atlanticcanuck @mrozatheist That is only semantics. To deny the proposition, "Witches exist," is to assert, "Witches do not."
-
-
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson Your statement is so clearly WRONG! Do you believe leprechauns exist? @emlynaddison@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtlanticCanuck
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist If I assert that "leprechauns do not exist," will you not require justification for my assertion?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson Yes. If you CLAIM they don’t exist, prove it! @emlynaddison@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtlanticCanuck
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist My point exactly from the very beginning.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson No, the burden of proof is on the claimant, not the disputant.@AtlanticCanuck@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison http://www.reasonablefaith.org/definition-of-atheism …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.