"Lack of belief" is itself a misnomer; it's a lack of *evidence* that merits any belief. #Atheism @AtlanticCanuck @MrOzAtheist @CICarson
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@MrOzAtheist@CICarson Not really. I lack a belief in a god bc there is no evidence that one exists but I still LACK BELIEF.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtlanticCanuck
@AtlanticCanuck "Lack" implies a deficiency. I don't "lack" belief in witches--there is nothing that merits belief.@MrOzAtheist@CICarson2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@atlanticcanuck@mrozatheist That is only semantics. To deny the proposition, "Witches exist," is to assert, "Witches do not."9 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson Your statement is so clearly WRONG! Do you believe leprechauns exist? @emlynaddison@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtlanticCanuck
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist If I assert that "leprechauns do not exist," will you not require justification for my assertion?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson Yes. If you CLAIM they don’t exist, prove it! @emlynaddison@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtlanticCanuck
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist My point exactly from the very beginning.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CICarson
@CICarson No, the burden of proof is on the claimant, not the disputant.@AtlanticCanuck@MrOzAtheist1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison http://www.reasonablefaith.org/definition-of-atheism …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.