Out of all of the atheists I have met, not a single one has given a logical and rational case that atheism, by proper definition, is true.
@CICarson No, the burden of proof is on the claimant, not the disputant. @AtlanticCanuck @MrOzAtheist
-
-
@CICarson @emlynaddison we are agnostic atheists if you want to call us that. But still atheists. -
-
@emlynaddison can you prove they don't exist?
-
@jlr3 I don't need to for our experiential reasoning contradicts the possibility in the first place. For the same reason that I don't need > -
@emlynaddison it implies a very high improbability, but it does not prove impossibility.
-
@jlr3 If you entertain the 0.001% possibility that French-Speaking Octopus Asteroids *could* exist then our known reality is meaningless. -
@emlynaddison make a claim of knowledge without evidence. That's the whole point of being a rationally thinking atheist to me.
- 3 more replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.