Out of all of the atheists I have met, not a single one has given a logical and rational case that atheism, by proper definition, is true.
"Lack of belief" is itself a misnomer; it's a lack of *evidence* that merits any belief. #Atheism @AtlanticCanuck @MrOzAtheist @CICarson
-
-
@emlynaddison
@MrOzAtheist@CICarson Not really. I lack a belief in a god bc there is no evidence that one exists but I still LACK BELIEF. -
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist While plenty of evidence is in support of God's existence, the concern is whether or not you -
@CICarson @emlynaddison@MrOzAtheist What evidence? There is none. -
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist The cosmological from contingency, Kalam cosmological, Moral, Teleological, and other Ontological -
@CICarson Philosophical arguments are not proof especially since each of those arguments starts w a conclusion. @emlynaddison@MrOzAtheist -
@AtlanticCanuck @emlynaddison@mrozatheist Starts with a conclusion? Demonstrate as such for us with one of the aforementioned arguments. -
@CICarson The teleological argument implies a condition of purpose--that you ascribe to a god. We don't.@AtlanticCanuck@MrOzAtheist
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.