@hpolak_es No. I'm not emotionally attached to a designer. I don't even know where you got that from. His book is garbage because it's
-
-
Replying to @ElijahT_87
@hpolak_es unbelievably philosophically shallow, most of his arguments are non-sequiturs, his criticisms of religion are either easily
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElijahT_87
@hpolak_es answered by simply turning on your brain or they are straw men. Have you read it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElijahT_87
I already said that I haven't read it,
@ElijiahT. ID, as you present it, contains a "special pleading" logical fallacy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtyHans
@hpolak_es Please explain where ID is guilty of special pleading. Its obvious that youre not listening to me, but keep talking. By all means
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElijahT_87
Special pleading: designer is outside science. Simple,
@ElijiahT.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AbandonFaith
He moved the goalposts to abiogenesis, @AndrewGraham01
@ElijiahT2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AtyHans
@hpolak_es @AndrewGraham01 I didnt move the goalposts. You asked what would falsify ID, I gave you one example. You're not very good at this
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ElijahT_87
I never claimed to be good at *it*,
@ElijiahT. I thought ID was evolution with a purpose until this convo. Now, I don't... @AndrewGraham012 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@hpolak_es @AndrewGraham01 Arguing religion is a study in human psychology: think how often we see this type of person arguing this way.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.