@DeanoMartino1 Now LACK OF EVIDENCE I'd agree with. But it can be passive (born) or active (conscious). @InbornAtheism @Stooshie @dead2god1
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1 Are you talking about not knowing, therefore not believing v knowing & not believing?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DeanoMartino1
@DeanoMartino1 Yes, this is what@InbornAtheism and I had talked about. Passive vs active atheism...@Stooshie @dead2god11 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1 In either scenario, you're an atheist. Technically, you're a-[anything ur ignorant of].1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeanoMartino1
@DeanoMartino1 Yes.@InbornAtheism was submitting how we might *define* that though. The language gets tricky.@Stooshie @dead2god12 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1 The topic was#atheism = You don't believe. That's it.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeanoMartino1
@DeanoMartino1 Which is why the definition can be so tricky.@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god12 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Better position is: "I think
#theism's statement is wrong", then "I do/have not"#Atheism@DeanoMartino1@Stooshie @dead2god11 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @InbornAtheism
@InbornAtheism "think" <--ouch. Theists "think" they're right too...it becomes subjective/objective..?@DeanoMartino1@Stooshie @dead2god13 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1 Most atheists are 6.x on that scale, since, again, you can't prove non-existence.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DeanoMartino1 Everything in our accepted/testable reality contradicts it. It is equivalent to knowing. @InbornAtheism @Stooshie @dead2god1
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.