-
-
Replying to @InbornAtheism
@InbornAtheism We don't need to re-verify our understanding of rain or toes or window glass on a regular basis to "know" them. @rune00771 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Yes, there are types of
#information: 1)Undisputed knowing -established as fact 2)Disputable understanding -theory @rune00771 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InbornAtheism
@InbornAtheism Even gravity is a theory :) @rune00772 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Yes,we
#know that something causes the attraction of objects, but we don't fully#understand/informed what is it @rune00771 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InbornAtheism
@InbornAtheism That's actually irrelevant; we KNOW how objects behave in gravity. I'm not buying your argument :) @rune00774 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison When we simply say "I know it" without clarifying to what extent we know it, we mislead ourselves & others. @rune0077
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@InbornAtheism To the extent that observable, testable, experience-able conditions uphold it. The rest is academic nit-picking! @rune0077
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.