-
-
@emlynaddison Yes,we
#know that something causes the attraction of objects, but we don't fully#understand/informed what is it @rune0077 -
@InbornAtheism That's actually irrelevant; we KNOW how objects behave in gravity. I'm not buying your argument :) @rune0077 -
@emlynaddison If u know for a fact in
#evidential sense,but r missing to know it in#explanatory sense,then u don't fully know it @rune0077 -
@InbornAtheism So you're arguing certainty. Can we know *precisely* why humans are born with 10 fingers? Who cares, it's still 10. @rune0077 -
@emlynaddison Many geneticists actually work on
#explanatory reasons providing#explanatory knowledge of why we have 10 fingers @rune0077 -
@InbornAtheism I'm sure the science goes deep but, epistemologically speaking, it's not a requirement for predicting it. @rune0077 -
@emlynaddison Lets put it this way: I know for a fact that humans have 10 fingers, but I don't know the reason why we have 10 @rune0077
-
@InbornAtheism I know for a fact there is no god, and I can probably guess at several reasons/causes why others don't. @rune0077 - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison
@InbornAtheism @rune0077 Gravity is a law. -
@DeanoMartino1 This describes the difference in application of law vs theory to gravity: http://thehappyscientist.com/science-experiment/gravity-theory-or-law …@InbornAtheism @rune0077
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.