@scott_hurst See Strong/Weak Atheism, Implicit/Inborn & Explicit/Acquired #Atheism in WIKI
@emlynaddison @Stooshie @dead2god1 @MindForgedOne
@scott_hurst But to CLASS them as "atheist" is only a product of theism's reach. @InbornAtheism @Stooshie @dead2god1 @MindForgedOne
-
-
@emlynaddison An oddity caused by of the anomoly of this mass delusion.
@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1@MindForgedOne -
@scott_hurst Yes.@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1@MindForgedOne -
Could you all remove me from the convo.? It's flooding my mentions. :( :: @emlynaddison @dead2god1
@inbornatheism@scott_hurst@stooshie - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison the ONLY reason for term "atheist" is that majority is something else.
@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1@MindForgedOne -
@scott_hurst Exactly. But given the infinite possibility of beliefs, a-labels become moot@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1@MindForgedOne -
@emlynaddison 2 types of "lack of belief": (1)Inborn uncaused condition. (2)Acquired caused effect
@scott_hurst@Stooshie@MindForgedOne -
@InbornAtheism (1) contradicts the implication of "lack"--that the individual *could* have learned of it but *didn't*@scott_hurst@Stooshie
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison it's a word that typically wouldn't exist.
@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1@MindForgedOne -
@scott_hurst Yes, but not because it is lacking/missing, but b/c it is actively rejected@InbornAtheism@Stooshie @dead2god1@MindForgedOne
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.