@WillNotBeSwayed Who WANTS car insurance?
@WillNotBeSwayed But the logic stands: when OTHERS aren't insured, who foots the bill?
-
-
@emlynaddison tax payers usually. I understand this. Never said I was against principle of ACA but am against invasive parts of enforcing it
-
@WillNotBeSwayed What irks me is that, after YEARS of ballooning costs and no plan, when one is finally passed many are quick to criticize.
-
@emlynaddison the discussion should have started years ago, but I feel we can do better than ACA. Ball is rolling, why not make it better?
-
@WillNotBeSwayed But conservatives don't appear to want any part of tinkering, altering or editing; just an across-the-board nullification.
-
@emlynaddison people on both sides are using "all or nothing" and not willing to budge.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed BTW I just happened upon this [MSM] piece, which addresses many of the points we covered: http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/calling-obamacare-socialism-makes-sense-analysis/story?id=20435162 …
-
@emlynaddison I will take a look when I have a minute and get back to you.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed No need to respond...just struck me as very relevant to many of our points.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison & since there will still be costs even if insured there will still be unpaid bills paid 4 by taxpayer.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed The logic is (was?) that lower premiums would motivate more to be insured. But we're back to education again.
-
@emlynaddison I hope it does work. Not sure why it must invade privacy of all however.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed Like most watered-down laws, it will have modest success, unless gains real traction. Single payer would have been best.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.