@WillNotBeSwayed There is no other way to ensure that the system stays funded while serving all. This was the problem.
@WillNotBeSwayed Ah, I see. When you wrote "liability is req by law. Not full coverage" I assumed you meant auto ins. I had seen this a lot.
-
-
@emlynaddison I did. You compared ACA to being req to have car insurance. Car ins only req 4 liability...which is to protect others not self
-
@WillNotBeSwayed But the logic stands: when OTHERS aren't insured, who foots the bill?
-
@emlynaddison tax payers usually. I understand this. Never said I was against principle of ACA but am against invasive parts of enforcing it
-
@WillNotBeSwayed What irks me is that, after YEARS of ballooning costs and no plan, when one is finally passed many are quick to criticize.
-
@emlynaddison the discussion should have started years ago, but I feel we can do better than ACA. Ball is rolling, why not make it better?
-
@WillNotBeSwayed But conservatives don't appear to want any part of tinkering, altering or editing; just an across-the-board nullification.
-
@emlynaddison people on both sides are using "all or nothing" and not willing to budge.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed BTW I just happened upon this [MSM] piece, which addresses many of the points we covered: http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/Politics/calling-obamacare-socialism-makes-sense-analysis/story?id=20435162 …
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.