@WillNotBeSwayed For some, not many. And the aim is to bring down healthcare costs overall, not just premiums.
@WillNotBeSwayed You just hit the nail on the head. When you can tell me how we better educate Americans to UNDERSTAND why it's so...
-
-
@emlynaddison liability is req by law. Not full coverage. Health ins is relatable to full coverage.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed As one of the justices said, health insurance is actually unlike anything else; there are no good comparisons.
-
@emlynaddison then don't compare it. I agree.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed You brought it up.
-
@emlynaddison no...you compared the two.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed Ah, I see. When you wrote "liability is req by law. Not full coverage" I assumed you meant auto ins. I had seen this a lot.
-
@emlynaddison I did. You compared ACA to being req to have car insurance. Car ins only req 4 liability...which is to protect others not self
-
@WillNotBeSwayed But the logic stands: when OTHERS aren't insured, who foots the bill?
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.