@UniteRight For many it will be lower cost. http://www.factcheck.org/2013/09/obamacare-myths/ …
But I doubt you'd care to entertain conflicting data.
@WillNotBeSwayed For some, not many. And the aim is to bring down healthcare costs overall, not just premiums.
-
-
@emlynaddison and how will ACA accomplish this?
-
@WillNotBeSwayed By at least acknowledging this http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/us-health-spending-breaks-from-the-pack/ … as an American problem, not a party one.
-
@emlynaddison ACA does not equal free health care. People still have to pay for care which means people will still default on payments.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed But it was gutted by the money-grubbers, like every other U.S. law, so what we're left with is only a marginal improvement.
-
@emlynaddison dont get me wrong, I am 4 providing cheaper alternative, but I am not in favor of forcing people 2 participate who dont want 2
-
@WillNotBeSwayed There is no other way to ensure that the system stays funded while serving all. This was the problem.
-
@emlynaddison if it was so great enough people would WANT to participate.
-
@WillNotBeSwayed Who WANTS car insurance?
- 18 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.