.@emlynaddison @chrisLrob no, one quote by one president proved the racism of someone who helped design & implement a racist policy
-
-
Replying to @TimothyODonnel2
@TimothyODonnel2 No, it just proves the adage that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. Can AA be proven 100% bad?@chrisLrob2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@TimothyODonnel2 Any law, policy or program that was designed to bridge the RACIAL divide would have been KEENLY vetted.@chrisLrob1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @aspexit
.@emlynaddison
@chrisLrob I think that is an extremely wide assumption1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimothyODonnel2
@TimothyODonnel2 At the height of racial tensions, do you not think that any such proposals would have been closely examined?@chrisLrob1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
.@emlynaddison
@chrisLrob I believe there may have been a time for AA, I think continuation of it is racist, & people don't even realize it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimothyODonnel2
@TimothyODonnel2 You might be perfectly right, but that doesn't mean the law was conceived as a means of destruction.@chrisLrob1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
.@emlynaddison
@chrisLrob and the policy I say was designed to be destructive was welfare, from the start this was the point of it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimothyODonnel2
@TimothyODonnel2 Again, because of one quote...or because this is just your opinion?@chrisLrob1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
.@emlynaddison
@chrisLrob no, it's fact based on the actual design of the policy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@TimothyODonnel2 In retrospect, quite possibly, but what we think we know now they might not known then. Again, hindsight. @chrisLrob
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.