@wood757 Not much discussion on climate science going on there. More of an ad hominem blog than a science blog.
@NoDirectAction A bus. Oh and maybe a bicycle or three.
But human affairs can't possibly impact the earth: http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29838444/ns/us_news-environment/t/oil-plagues-sound-years-after-exxon-valdez/ … @wood757
-
-
@emlynaddison Yes, we all oppose oil spills. Some are opposed to wind turbines for similar reasons. Have you trialed your cycling idea yet?
-
@NoDirectAction Yes, like Big Oil "opposes" them. Wind energy is not a final solution, but it will be a part of one.@wood757 -
@emlynaddison That's a
#GreenMyth. Some big energy firms invest in wind energy because returns are guaranteed by taxpayer subsidies.#AusPol -
@NoDirectAction So wind energy, by your logic, will have NO PLACE in ANY energy future. Excellent. Tell me what happens when oil runs out. -
@emlynaddison Small scale wind energy is good for pumping ground water on farms. Traditional small scale is far more neighbourly as well.
-
@NoDirectAction "Small scale"? Denmark's 2012 electricity supply from wind power was 35.3%. Germany & Netherlands are catching up.@wood757 -
@emlynaddison At a high cost. Without back up from reliable sources more Europeans would have frozen to death in the winter of 2012.
#AusPol -
@NoDirectAction Yes, Bill. Like I said about EIGHT tweets ago, wind power is PART OF THE SOLUTION. Now go bug someone else.@wood757 - 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison
@NoDirectAction@wood757 So why ain't you on your bike NOW????#auspol#qanda#climatechange#globalwarming#agw -
@ILuvCO2@NoDirectAction@wood757 You sound like a jesus freak. I's always the Twitter whores who front-load their piffle with hashtags.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.