Google couldn’t decide between two blues, so it tested 41 shades to see which one performs better. http://bit.ly/1bIsO7X
-
-
Replying to @lakey
Sounds like my time at AOL. Corporate goliaths don't understand Michelangelo's David. http://bit.ly/1bIsO7X
@lakey@stop@lauramholson2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@stop@lauramholson I think testing is really important and makes sense, especially if you're a UX designer or web designer.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lakey
@lakey But what, really, is testable about the difference between a 3, 4, or 5 pixel border? IMO that's...punctilious.@stop@lauramholson1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@stop@lauramholson Oh, I totally agree about that. Madness. Intuition and instinct go a long way. Tests should help finesse.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lakey
@lakey @emlynaddison@lauramholson Testing can certainly help validate hypotheses. I cringe when it’s used as a definitive decision maker.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@stop @lakey Otherwise it feels like a phony excuse to make the team feel like they're practicing due diligence. @lauramholson
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.