Google couldn’t decide between two blues, so it tested 41 shades to see which one performs better. http://bit.ly/1bIsO7X
Sounds like my time at AOL. Corporate goliaths don't understand Michelangelo's David. http://bit.ly/1bIsO7X @lakey @stop @lauramholson
-
-
@emlynaddison
@stop@lauramholson I think testing is really important and makes sense, especially if you're a UX designer or web designer. -
@lakey But what, really, is testable about the difference between a 3, 4, or 5 pixel border? IMO that's...punctilious.@stop@lauramholson -
@emlynaddison
@stop@lauramholson Oh, I totally agree about that. Madness. Intuition and instinct go a long way. Tests should help finesse. -
@lakey @emlynaddison@lauramholson Testing can certainly help validate hypotheses. I cringe when it’s used as a definitive decision maker. -
@stop @emlynaddison As you say, half of the fun in branding and design is taking risks. Testing UX is one thing, aesthetics are different.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison
@stop@lauramholson Would have been good to have Doug along to speak at the Festival of Marketing: http://bit.ly/1eJYT0lThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.