@GodvsAtheism Irrelevant. One's fiction does not impose the condition of "belief" in it on another. @atheistowls @jlandmark
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @atheistowls
@jlandmark Want to rephrase that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AncientTincture
@GodvsAtheism Did you not understand? @atheistowls@jlandmark1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @atheistowls
@jlandmark I didn't understand how it was relevant. Do you think I'm trying to change peoples minds or something?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AncientTincture
@GodvsAtheism Your "wayyy past" comment is irrelevant. You characterize atheism as "belief in non-evidence" of gods. @atheistowls@jlandmark1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @atheistowls
@jlandmark NO, you characterized me as characterizing#atheism that way. Dig deeper, I know better than that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AncientTincture
RT
@GodvsAtheism: "You __believe__ there is no evidence to support the idea of an actual physical God." All done? @atheistowls@jlandmark5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @atheistowls
@jlandmark I know u cant prove something doesn't exist..so stfu on that..it is her belief evidence doesn't exist4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AncientTincture
@GodvsAtheism It is her KNOWLEDGE that deities and EVIDENCE FOR DEITIES don't exist. You're not being honest. @atheistowls@jlandmark1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @atheistowls
@jlandmark I honestly don't know wtf you're talking about. You just gonna repeat the same stuff over and over?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@GodvsAtheism Because you are EVADING the point; you NEED her atheism to be belief to safeguard your defense. @atheistowls @jlandmark
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.