.@jonasarvind There is no greater evidence of humans' silly superstitiousness than moral allegories dolled up as actualizations of reality.
-
-
Replying to @jonasarvind
.
@jonasarvind Our morality has only ever been our own. Religions hijack morality/science/thought/etc and recast it to serve their narrative.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison here is a good essay on morality you should share with
@jonasarvind - http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2012/05/22/the-objective-morality-gotcha/ …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tadmaster
.
@tadmaster@jonasarvind It is much, much simpler than this. Objective morality must answer to survival: does an action benefit one's genes?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@jonasarvind - but we've evolved the ability to rationalize behaviors (ie, religion) not necessarily helpful to our genes1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tadmaster
@tadmaster Not rationalize; codify -> Massive difference. We still innately know the difference between right & wrong.@jonasarvind1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@tadmaster The discovery of an isolated Amazonian tribe suggests that morality exists far from any religious institutions.@jonasarvind1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison right, but anthropologically, what is religion if not an attempt to codify & rationalize complex systems?
@jonasarvind3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tadmaster
@emlynaddison before we came up with scientific methods and brought rigor & logic to the game, superstition ruled the day :-)
@jonasarvind1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@tadmaster Thus answering your own question: superstitions guided our framing of morality; science now explains it w/ genes. @jonasarvind
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.