@chanesteiner Ours is "a government for, by, and of the people". If we are the government, why are we paranoid of it? Guns guarantee NOTHING
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison We used to be. We are not anymore. It's an illusion that we actually have a choice in the matter. Campaigns cost millions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner This is irrelevant re paranoia and guns. If THE PEOPLE don't like it, they should stop complaining and RUN FOR OFFICE.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison I'm sorry, but that's just silly. To run for office, you have to raise millions from corporations. Impossible for most.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner So because elections cost millions we should buy guns?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison I'm responding to the "if you don't like it, run for office" silliness. If you want to ban guns, run for office. lol Good luck
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner And there's the rub: "Try and take 'em away" they cry. It's an ensconced cultural hangover for man-children who like toys.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison You want to punish the 99.999% of all gun owners who have never, nor would ever, kill anyone. Ridiculous.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner That's the price of _freedom for everyone_. And it's ironic that you'd use the word "punish" if it was aimed to save lives.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Taking something away from people is punishing them. I gotta run. Good discussion. We'll agree to disagree. Take care.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@chanesteiner Which is worse: taking away guns or taking away the lives of innocents? With respect, that's more than "disagreeing".
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.