@chanesteiner Given population explosion I don't see an alternative and "self-governance" does not work for nation-states of 300+ million.
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison We can't sacrifice our liberty under any circumstances. Limited government would work.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner (Actually, we can give up liberties: instead of giving up children's lives, we could give up, say, guns. But I digress...)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Ignoring the disturbing amount of mental health issues & instead focusing on inanimate objects is incomprehensible to me.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner Said "inanimate objects" empower said mentally disturbed with the means to take others' lives. Why is that incomprehensible?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Because the mentally disturbed will find other inanimate objects. Their disturbance is the problem, not the objects.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner This is a _fundamental_ misinterpretation. Killing rampages aren't accomplished with knives, batons, poison or cars.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison But, they would be if you successfully took guns away from people as happened before guns existed.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chanesteiner
@chanesteiner Guns allow the angry/depressives to do more harm to more people in less time. It's not much more complicated than that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison Ok, so first we take away the hundreds of millions of guns. Then, household products that can make bombs, then... delusional.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@chanesteiner And yes, it does actually start with taking guns away...but we have to start somewhere, sometime.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.