"@JohnMartignoni: Sorry, but I am intolerant towards sin, not against gender or sex." And there's your religious bigot
-
-
Replying to @AtyHans
@hpolak_es
@JohnMartignoni "Sin" is a subjective religious label defined by scripture; it is not an incontrovertible, absolutist designation1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @hpolak_es Okay, so I'll ask you: Was what Hitler did to the Jews sin, or virtue?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JohnMartignoni
@JohnMartignoni @hpolak_es What Hitler did was human behavior; nothing more. Society makes a moral judgement about that behavior.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @hpolak_es Well, the German society of the time felt it to be okay, so I guess it was morally okay, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JohnMartignoni
@JohnMartignoni @hpolak_es Had most of them known about the truth of it. Let's at least start with accurate history.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @hpolak_es If most of German society had known the truth about Hitler, yet still backed him, then that would have been moral?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JohnMartignoni
@JohnMartignoni @hpolak_es You're using hypotheticals. Stick to historical fact.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison @hpolak_es Or, at the very least, did nothing to oppose him. To say they didn't know the truth is a bit of a stretch.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@JohnMartignoni @hpolak_es Supporting data, please. I'm all done with people-fictions.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.