@AandGandCandT @GSpellchecker When it comes to Hitchens we should probably tread carefully: http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/comment/articles/2013-04/01/michael-wolff-on-christopher-hitchens/page/1 … Other side of the coin?
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison I'm not sure what your point is. Seems like conjecture and character criticism to me. No shortage of that @AandGandCandT
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GSpellchecker
@emlynaddison Agree with
@GSpellchecker .. just want to add that this GQ piece seems written with great envy and little fact-checking2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Andrew_X_Thomas
@stephen_t_james
@GSpellchecker People misunderstand my take on this: I'm enormously respectful of Hitchens, but he was very, very human.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison
@GSpellchecker I agree with you on his humanity. I don't dispute his shortcomings just some of the things this writer states1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Andrew_X_Thomas
@stephen_t_james
@GSpellchecker And I never said that I agreed with everything he wrote, only that it was illuminating. Everyone got so gaga1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison But you cited a clearly biased, ad hominem attack as some sort of counter-point. It's irrelevant. @stephen_t_james
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@GSpellchecker @stephen_t_james Nobody fully knows a man, not Wolff and not us--least of all us.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.