@AandGandCandT @GSpellchecker When it comes to Hitchens we should probably tread carefully: http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/comment/articles/2013-04/01/michael-wolff-on-christopher-hitchens/page/1 … Other side of the coin?
-
-
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison I'm not sure what your point is. Seems like conjecture and character criticism to me. No shortage of that @AandGandCandT
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GSpellchecker
@emlynaddison Agree with
@GSpellchecker .. just want to add that this GQ piece seems written with great envy and little fact-checking2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Andrew_X_Thomas
@stephen_t_james
@GSpellchecker Fact-checking? He worked WITH him. And things like his Iraq stance & incomplete biography aren't disputed.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aspexit
@emlynaddison So, anecdotal then? I didn't read anything in it that seemed worthy of attention. @stephen_t_james
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@GSpellchecker @stephen_t_james Thought leaders are revered. Hitchens, for all his wit & intelligence, was apparently adept at manipulation.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.