@rickygervais I believe the two are mutually exclusive. "Evolutionary creationism" could be a possibility. The length of time is irrelevant
@TroyBakerVA @rickygervais Irrelevant? So all of earth, geology, flora, fauna, fossils & living & extinct species could have taken 1 second?
-
-
@emlynaddison
@rickygervais and sure, why not? All of time, space and matter were created in far less. -
@TroyBakerVA@rickygervais True, but fossils and extinct species--that we're fairly certain exist/ed--imply a definite duration of time. -
@emlynaddison
@rickygervais sure they do. But that doesn't speak to my point. -
@TroyBakerVA Yeah, I'm not sure what that is. -
@emlynaddison my "point" was simply that the question of "when" and "by whom" are two separate questions. Not inextricably tied.
-
@TroyBakerVA "By whom" would be the first point of contention. The rest is theological masturbation. -
@emlynaddison "contention" implies debate, as opposed to conversation. I may be mistaken, but you seem very argumentative.
-
@TroyBakerVA Damn right, when I detect religious myth proposed as fact, even hypotheticals. Life's too short. OK tired of this now.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emlynaddison
@rickygervais@ginodibiasi I'm simply stating that the "how" is a more interesting question than "how long".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.