To wit: Bradley Manning: Criminal or Whistleblower? http://motherjones.com/politics/2012/01/bradley-manning-criminal-whistleblower-wikileaks … via @motherjones
@tadmaster Your last tweet, to many, would support their whole argument on secrecy. Endangerment is one thing, unused processes is another.
-
-
@emlynaddison oh, and I thought of an example of the process working: former LtCol Allen West.
-
@tadmaster And did he make known, one way or another, anything like the same type of documents? Was he considered a whistleblower? -
@emlynaddison - quite the opposite http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_West_(politician)#section_2 …
-
@tadmaster Well then htf does it apply to Manning's case? You spoke of a legal process for whistleblowing on classified documents. -
@emlynaddison you don't "blow the whistle" on documents; you blow a whistle on misdeeds. It doesn't appear that you understand the situation
-
@tadmaster It doesn't appear that you understand my question. Did Manning not "blow the whistle" on state via docs? West eg seems irrelevant -
@emlynaddison - No; Manning broke the law, then tried to claim virtue. West is evidence of the system working as it should - without leaks.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.