Ann Skelton

@askelton_CCL

Director Centre for Child Law

Vrijeme pridruživanja: svibanj 2012.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @askelton_CCL

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @askelton_CCL

  1. 20. stu 2019.

    CRC@30 Children describing Geneva conference as life changing, a real participation experience.

    Poništi
  2. 18. stu 2019.

    Celebrating 30 Years in Geneva, listening to powerful panel presentations by children

    Poništi
  3. 16. ruj 2019.

    At Palais des Nations celebrating the 30 year anniversary of the CRC with amazing child rights activists who are calling for the vote and the saving of the planet.

    Poništi
  4. 16. stu 2012.

    Rivonia case over, Amici team rushing to airport, feeling that our submissions made a difference.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  5. 16. stu 2012.

    Kemack now presenting the reply for the appellants. Court seems disinterested and warn him not to re-argue the case.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  6. 16. stu 2012.

    Nugent J says amicus has been friendly and helpful but friendship has limits. In other words time's up!

    Poništi
  7. 16. stu 2012.

    Court poses question: are you saying HOD exercised his discretion reasonably in this case? Budlender: No.

    Poništi
  8. 16. stu 2012.

    Court proposes a declaration that the power to set aside decisions on a reasonable basis.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  9. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender's magic is working, the Court's demeanour has shifted.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  10. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender; if it is 30 children, and a new teacher needed, it would be unreasonable unless extra resources provided,@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  11. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender adds that if it is 1 or 2 children the additional costs will be minimal and therefore not unreasonable.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  12. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender makes slight concession that the power to take extra children may go with a duty provide additional resources.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  13. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender: It depends on what is reasonable in the circumstances. If only a desk is required, it may be ok.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  14. 16. stu 2012.

    Court asking that if HOD has the power, can it force the school to take child using its own resources? @ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  15. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender: If there is an appeal to MEC/HOD the s/he must decide on a reasonable basis. Court showing interest in this.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  16. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender; SGB mus exercise is discretion on the facts of each case.

    Poništi
  17. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender's argument is that SGB has discretion to set policy. @ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  18. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender: 1st argument is that MEC does have power to set aside a decision of the school.@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  19. 16. stu 2012.

    Budlender: we will focus on whether there is a power to override the SGBs power to determine capacity,@ChildLawUP

    Poništi
  20. 16. stu 2012.

    Steven Budlender up next for the amici curiae (Equal Education + Centre for Child Law).@ChildLawUP

    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·