Our arguments are just to spend more time thinking of different approaches. You don't like that?
-
-
-
Replying to @sirdarckcat @patricktoomey and
I'm 100% for it, but other approaches are nowhere near ready as replacements/alternatives to CSP.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arturjanc @sirdarckcat and
Also, fixating on the "CSP" label is silly; the spec includes many things, some useful, some not.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @arturjanc @sirdarckcat and
Working on new primitives: awesome. Saying "stop improving the only working thing": not so much.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Sure; but there are useful ideas for limiting XSS surface that we can add as opt-in
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @arturjanc @sirdarckcat and
Being automatically against them "because CSP" is short-sighted and unnecessary.
10:35 AM - 5 Feb 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
2 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.