Nothing but CSP has caught on, not because of monopoly, but other issues. Solve them, we all win.
-
-
Replying to @arturjanc @patricktoomey and
I'm not sure if you are arguing for even more attention on CSP, or what :-).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sirdarckcat @arturjanc and
Our arguments are just to spend more time thinking of different approaches. You don't like that?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @sirdarckcat @patricktoomey and
I'm 100% for it, but other approaches are nowhere near ready as replacements/alternatives to CSP.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arturjanc @sirdarckcat and
Also, fixating on the "CSP" label is silly; the spec includes many things, some useful, some not.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @arturjanc @sirdarckcat and
Working on new primitives: awesome. Saying "stop improving the only working thing": not so much.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes
I'm all for that, other ideas benefit us greatly and I contribute time to them too.
10:31 AM - 5 Feb 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.