It feels like a "everyone knows integers; complex numbers are approximations of ints" argument. Their truth is a naive subset of reality.
-
-
-
Replying to @sarahlicity @Hbomberguy
I've watched some of his stuff a while ago but didn't realize he was controversial. Good to know.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @jmlane @Hbomberguy
tbh the only thing about him that annoys people is his insistence that real numbers don't exist. :p
1 reply 0 retweets 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @EvilNinjadude @sarahlicity and
I mean, numbers, in general, don't "exist"
1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @EvilNinjadude and
Yeah but NJW's claim isn't so much that numbers don't exist, rather that infinite sets don't exist within maths; he claims that any (cont)
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @hwd405 @arthur_affect and
number with a non-recurring decimal expansion must be "wrong" in some way or not exist - he believes the set of real numbers doesn't exist
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @hwd405 @EvilNinjadude and
Yeah iirc this is "constructivism"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @EvilNinjadude and
Something like that yeah, I've heard "finitism" used to describe it too
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
I get not being interested in Cantor but being mad at him is silly
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.