Rowling is often pointing out how she officially interprets her own texts. Sometimes she admits she hasn't thought about something
-
-
Replying to @BootlegGirl
For example, she's on record as having No Opinion about Voldemort's sex life beyond that he managed to make a baby once
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl
The second thing is, the first and still most famous Rowling Retcon addressed a huge toxicity in fandom
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl
Now, I fault Rowling for not actually revealing that Dumbledore was gay in the books,although I'm pretty sure editorial pressure contributed
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl
But before she made that explicit, there was a huge and vocal homophobe contingent that made stupid arguments >
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl
> like "this story with torture and het sex and murder and more torture is FOR KIDS, there's no homosexuals"
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl
A major pre-social media HP forum banned all slashfic while permitting somewhat graphic het fic, in the pre book 7 era
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @adrienneleigh @BootlegGirl
It's a meta Death of "Death of the Author" scenario. If everyone thinks the author's take matters then it does matter
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Which is actually one of the major splits between poststructuralism and the New Critics they replaced
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.