Oh dear. Can I see the source? *puts on leadsuit*
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You're blatantly lying. I said nothing like that. Stop fabricating.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
No, you're also a liar. I never said they were unethical. And this was the very next tweet:https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/869561258701447168 …
-
LOL these are 'more serious' than Snowden and Manning?!
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Now you're saying he's anti-black? He's saying they're more serious from a legal perspective, but they're still justified.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Its almost like they never believed in radical transparency
-
That's not GG said. Only pointing out the hypocrisy when Obama's administration was imprisoning whistleblowers.https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/869561258701447168 …
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Do you underst and WHY people desperately avoid responding to substance?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
the *main* thing I know about Glenn Greenwald from following him is the opposite of this - that he is largely a defender of leakers.
-
I am confused - are you genuinely uninformed about his general writing/sentiment and mistakenly took one tweet out of context?
-
Its rooted in the irrational resentment & McCarthyism that has swept across the left and created mass hysteria with a Rusky under ever rock
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
IMO Snowden stealing secrets and getting him to Russia was organized by Putin, who used Greenwald and Assange as tools to cover.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
didn't say unethical
-
true, I just don't get the double-speak when we use words like "crime" and "condemnation"
-
Considering he supported the "crime" of Snowden it shouldnt be that tough to get.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.