This is just putting ice in champagne like an asshole, but worse
-
-
-
Replying to @JanetSKWatson @arthur_affect
Well maybe but odds are someone did it for exposure
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gretared
You can tell bc we have no idea who they are or what their name is
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @gretared
Well, if they didn't get paid and there's no actual exposure, then we're back to the a$$h0le theory.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JanetSKWatson @gretared
No I'm saying that's what usually happens when you work for exposure
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @gretared
You don't actually get exposure. (Going out of their way to give you meaningful marketing opps is a bigger ask than a small fee)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @gretared
So there's no real exposure, bc worth too much to give out. I bet Ivanka doesn't rush to pay, either. So someone else stiffed by the family?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @gretared
Ivanka doesn't actually run the Ivanka Trump brand anymore and technically isn't supposed to have any contact with it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Which is a ridiculous concept when it's named for her
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.