the word "moving" doesn't make sense without designating a t
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
that's what "motion" means, variation on x y or z relative to t
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
so yes from a 4d POV any "object" is just a line you draw through x, y, z and t
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
So why do we have the capability to move in directions we more or less control >
@arthur_affect@ireneista@adrienneleigh@ladyaeva2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl @ireneista and
"control" is a thing you perceive yourself doing and has no real meaning in physics
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
(see this is where we have problems with philosophy again)
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
physics can't disprove "free will" but can make it hard to explain what that even means
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
I mean this is where my reading peters out - theres prolly a reason our minds are this way
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
entropy is prolly a thing bc the universe is shaped a certain way
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
the t dimension opens up less than the other three starting from the origin point
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
kind of like a 3D cone if you draw lines in that cone the lines going along the cone's axis
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
will have more places to go, will be longer lines
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @BootlegGirl and
theres a higher chance that longer lines (chains of stuff happening) will become people
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.