but that's not the point
-
-
Replying to @ireneista @BootlegGirl and
yes the philosophy stuff abt time is technically distinct from science
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
but if you actually understand and believe that this is what happens
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
then philosophically it's v hard to maintain a belief in objective time
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
you p much have to admit it amounts to picking one observer arbitrarily
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
like sure maybe there is an objective Now and it's whenever Now is in Jerusalem
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
bc God's Word or whatever but that's a much harder case to make
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
and relativity is the easier stuff too
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
young Einstein v easily accepted this stuff abt There Is No Now, etc
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
but quantum mechanics freaked him out enough he spent his whole later life
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
trying to find a way to make it not be true
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
way I've heard it broken down is our world is made of things that move around
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ireneista and
the moving around part - speed and time - doesn't really work that way
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.