Right the whole issue is different relative levels of social safety net haven't done much to change levels of reactionary politicshttps://twitter.com/marcushjohnson/status/838602404564201472 …
-
-
but they're being told the system which you described is bad for them, so why vote against it if the policies are better?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Better question: Would "$15 and Fair" have prevented Trump? Too many people in precarious position financially breeds fear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
worth remembering that that means Brexit support (won by several %) was >much< stronger than Trump support (lost by several)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Europe has also been hit a lot harder by austerity. NHS is being cut, unemployment in mainland Europe is high.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Social democracy certainly isn't sufficient. This is because the problems w/actually existing capitalism run far deeper.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not because there is no link b/w race issues and class. Any agenda that doesn't address both isn't progressive & will fail.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Woke centrism is not a way forward.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
there's a feedback effect. Stronger safety nets exist in more homogeneous countries (Scandinavia), and there's little /1
-
appetite to eliminate them. Where underclasses are racially segregated , entire political parties want to eliminate the /2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.