In other words: if the US were to destroy an intelligence repository with bombing when it was compromised, > @ducklingsmith @chrysopoetics
-
-
Replying to @BootlegGirl
> killing American staff as well as infiltrators, would that be something that the UN would object to?
@ducklingsmith@chrysopoetics3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl @chrysopoetics
By definition Tarkin can't be operating with Senate authority because they don't know DS exists
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @ducklingsmith
But being illegal by Empire law doesn't make it a war crime (anymore than stealing Rogue One >
@ducklingsmith@chrysopoetics2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BootlegGirl @chrysopoetics
Well you hit a huge issue there. The Empire considers the Alliance a terrorist uprising, so do the laws of >
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
> war operate? OTOH Tarkin would instead be court-martialled for *ludicrous* "friendly fire"
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
In-universe the Republic/Empire has been the universal state since time immemorial
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ducklingsmith and
so like most historical empires their "laws of war" probably define all war as rebellion or crime
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @ducklingsmith and
also the legality of Scarrif i#is immaterial, at this point everything the Emperir does us legal
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect
Yeah,but the point of the exercise is to apply our laws of war.
@arthur_affect@ducklingsmith@chrysopoetics2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
well, the lack of legislative oversight on Scarif is still immaterial
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.