No, not really. "Biologically male" organisms do not, as a class, have similar chromosomes, genitalia or ability to give birthhttps://twitter.com/ryancmack/status/814624085812670464 …
-
-
It'd be like trying to explain to an ancient person why you, against all common sense, decided that whales aren't actually fish
-
I love the chromosomal argument given 1 in 2000 natal males are 46'XX, as are their fathers and male ofspring
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Seahorses don't quite have the relevance that close human relatives- such as Chimps and Bonobos- have re: human physiology
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.