Well yes, and this is the same reason why for archiving audio a physical master of a record is better than any digital filehttps://twitter.com/LDBurnett/status/814458480065212416 …
With digital media, if people are paying attention, it's likely easier to generate an immediate "paper trail" of attempted stealth edits
-
-
There's also the fact that paper isn't really forever unless someone is taking deliberate steps to archive old books
-
Nothing is really forever. But as technologies go, the codex is simple and durable. Buying printed books=accidental archiving
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It's also easier to cover your tracks. (The intelligent design case showed how hard it is to cover the tracks physically)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.